Currently the Lord Magistrate names Holder Alliances for certain areas. These entitled Allliance executors task their corps with the administration
of systems and the corp CEOs divide responsibilities among their directors, officers and pilots.
I see nothing proposed to change this except for giving them a uniform naming convention.
To be clear, I oppose any change to the described system. Names and titles we can discuss, if deemed important.
On names:
I see no reason to change the title of Lord Magistrate as the one held by the executor of the CVA.
It is humble, yet clear. He is not sovereign but one who holds an office in place of the emperor.
His task is to oversee all of Greater Amarria and mediate between it's holders.
If you want to use "Warden" as a title I suggest is simply to be Warden of -system name-
The War-Hold part is unnecessary.
I question wether it is our place to tell holder alliances what they have to call their officers.
Telling an Alliance to call their Executor title a while they have been referring to him by another one for years would be improper.
The same goes for corps and lower.
All we should do is make suggestions to alliances and corps who have not implemented a system yet.
In doing so we should abstain from using anything that could challenge imperial supremacy.
One such word is sovereign. The other is knight.
I suggest
- Lord Magistrate (CVA exec)
- Protector (holder alliance exec)
- Warden (Someone Overseeing several systems)
- Governour ((Obsolete spelling intended

- Sir without additional title (honour granted by Governours or higher to deserving members who have also been given a personal claim in their hold, ofc pending imperial recognition)
All these titles can be granted to non-amarr as they describe office without implying nobility and will not offend true holders.